Depending upon the direction of the 6500ft, that 0?ø00'33" and 0.73ft difference is a common miss amount for direct closure.
It is the difference between plane surveying and GPS surveying.
I would imagine that the computed distance between both ends are much closer.
That be so, you are good.
Rotate your traverse to fit the GPS and then perform a DMD or StarNet or Crandall Rule correction.
:gammon:
Thanks to everyone who contributed to my knowledge of the subject matter!
Field Dog, post: 444154, member: 9186 wrote: Thanks to everyone who contributed to my knowledge of the subject matter!
Cool.
What was the outcome?
Peter Ehlert, post: 444169, member: 60 wrote: Cool.
What was the outcome?
The office adjusted the traverse points. I haven't had the chance to run the numbers through a least squares program yet. I want to compare my results to what the office came up with. Eventually I'd like to post the data. As suggested, I checked both bearing and distance between the first and last traverse points and the first and last GPS points. The following data is from the unadjusted points.
Traverse - N 0?ø-10'-27" W, 6273.17'
GPS - N 0?ø-10'-03" W, 6273.16'
Traverse (Geodetic) - N 0?ø-27'-33" W, 6273.28'
GPS (Geodetic) - N 0?ø-27'-10" W, 6273.27'
Can anyone tell me how to import a.dxf into magnet field; and run a 3-pt localization off of points created? I'm beyond relieved to finally put a dial-up to work. The reciever's a GCX-3 on a SHC-5000 tablet. SO much easier to see than the rental controllers. Any good youtube links or dealer .pdf's would be much appreciated.