AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

NGS Benchmark

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
971 Views
spledeus
(@spledeus)
Posts: 2757
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hello,

I just heard that a developer might be plowing down an old Benchmark. I was hoping to find the correct federal statute that would help put the fear of fines into his mind to help preserve the benchmark.

PID ab7962

It is on private property and I am not sure when it was set. I believe it was by the old Mass. Geodetic Survey. FEMA used it in the 80's for an RM. NGS uses it now for a BM. And NOAA is about to use it for control for a 1st Order Tide Gauge.

Thanks


 
Posted : September 8, 2017 11:53 am
ddsm
 ddsm
(@ddsm)
Posts: 2222
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I--CRIMES

CHAPTER 91--PUBLIC LANDS

Sec. 1858. Survey marks destroyed or removed

Whoever willfully destroys, defaces, changes, or removes to another
place any section corner, quarter-section corner, or meander post, on
any Government line of survey, or willfully cuts down any witness tree
or any tree blazed to mark the line of a Government survey, or willfully
defaces, changes, or removes any monument or bench mark of any
Government survey, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than six months, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 789; Pub. L. 103-322, title XXXIII,
Sec. 330016(1)(E), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 111 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch.
321, Sec. 57, 35 Stat. 1099).
Minor changes were made in phraseology.

Amendments

1994--Pub. L. 103-322 substituted ``fined under this title'' for
``fined not more than $250''.

Attached files

Benchmark_4_1_2011.pdf (599.9 KB)  marvin marker.pdf (340.9 KB) 


 
Posted : September 8, 2017 12:09 pm
bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

reference to 18 U.S. Code ?? 1858
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1858

American Surveyor article about fines
http://www.amerisurv.com/content/view/3770/153/

Data sheet:
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_mark.prl?PidBox=ab7962

Geocaching logs and pictures
https://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=ab7962




 
Posted : September 8, 2017 12:18 pm
bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Although very few people get in trouble for disturbing survey monuments, Jerry Penry's article in American Surveyor linked above mentions a contractor who was warned but willfully destroyed a HARN point and had $10K withheld from his payment.


 
Posted : September 8, 2017 12:44 pm
spmpls
(@spmpls)
Posts: 660
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

California has laws to cover this for any horizontal or vertical control, property corners, etc... not just Federal monuments.

http://law.onecle.com/california/business/8771.html

Wisconsin DOT takes a bite out of you if destroy a geodetic mark on a project that involves any of their funding.

http://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/doing-bus/eng-consultants/cnslt-rsrces/tools/wiscors/geodetic-control-replacement-procedure.pdf


 
Posted : September 8, 2017 12:54 pm