Either the article is grossly over-simplified or this is a flop in the making. It will be interesting to see something in action...
I'm interested as well. It is really a matter of time before someone figures out how to do this with software or shrink survey grade receivers to fit in a phone.
That would change the game completely
Looks like I may hold off on buying that $20K receiver! (wink)
If they came out with a decimeter model, would it be even cheaper? o.O
I recall some mention of license fees due to patents on dual-frequency algorithms or some such adding substantial cost to the bump from L1-only to L1/L2. Is a license-free dual frequency solution around the bend as a result of new civilian signals?
Jim Frame, post: 326079, member: 10 wrote: I recall some mention of license fees due to patents on dual-frequency algorithms or some such adding substantial cost to the bump from L1-only to L1/L2. Is a license-free dual frequency solution around the bend as a result of new civilian signals?
I seem to remember Eric Gakstatter speaking somewhere (ESRI User Conference maybe) that you'll eventually be able to get a license-free duel frequency solution for L1/L5 and that's when you see sub $500 equipment delivering centimeter-ish solutions