AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

More on Rural Roads and Widths

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
289 Views
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

In my corner of PLSSia nearly all county roads have records indicating proof of the initial petition by the nearby landowners seeking creation of a farm to market road. The county commission would then send out the county engineer/surveyor to evaluate the feasibility of the project and consider possible damages owed to unwilling landowners along the path. Most of our documents list the path to be followed and the total width. In some cases, the middle of the road DOES NOT follow the section line or quarter section. For example, some 60-foot roads are 20 feet off of one landowner and 40 feet off of the other landowner. In rare instances the entire road may be off of one landowner. I've found one road that was laid out with the centerline beginning 30 feet to the east of a section corner and running south one mile to a point 30 feet west of the section corner, resulting in each landowner giving up the same amount of land but in a very long triangular shape.

There are statutory road widths that changed over the past 150 years. These only come into play for those roads for which the width was not stated in the road records. The earliest roads, by statute, were to be 66 feet wide.


 
Posted : July 15, 2012 6:07 pm