AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Mineral Surveys

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
321 Views
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The Colonial Land Surveying thread is closed, I don't know if it got too bitchy, but I was going to post a little blurb about mineral surveys since it drifted that direction.

In the early 20th century patents begin to be issued without mineral ownership attached. It started with the Feds retaining coal rights and slipped into them owning all minerals.

Later, about mid century if I remember correctly even gravel was retained.

So now many mineral surveys are done that have nothing to do with surface ownership, except to get there the patent lines need to be considered. Here is an example of one:

This is an OG plat that helps to explain mineral ownership:

I would say Loyal is correct that most mineral surveys were also surface based since they were done on Federal lands, however, today many are done for minerals under surface ownership and have little to do with the surface owner, with the exception that patent lines need to be figured out. Because of that Scott also has a point, however, I suspect that split estate in Texas is private vs. private for the most part while out here in PLSS lands its private vs private,,,,,,,or private vs. government and often private vs private vs government.


 
Posted : July 30, 2018 2:01 pm