The hold to allow a subdivision to go forward is a permitting issue. The powers that be added 90 extra landowners from the original count of 45 to give "consent".
So......each and every landowner needs to be put on a map, all the deeds pulled, a spreadsheet designed, then forms mailed and tracked for each one to sign and those forms need a notary. Out of about 140 I expect to get maybe 10 back, maybe less then the process starts again.?ÿ
Well.....one of the landowners subdivided recently and still owns some of the subdivision lots. The reviewer wants a legal for each lot proving that the subdivider owns them. So I forward the plat with the dedication of the owner, his address, signature of the clerk and recorder, the recording numbers, all that. Even a copy of the county GIS showing the recording numbers.
NOPE!!!!
The reviewer consulted with department lawyers and said lawyers declared that the law requires a deed.?ÿ
Really?
Finally I sent the deed prior to the creation of the plat, for some reason that satisfied them.
WOW!!!
When you send them the proposed bill for the work, they're surely going to say more than just wow...
???? ???? ????ÿ
You inherit more "train wrecks" in a month than I did in five years. ?????ÿ
Our statutes state filing a plat equates to the filing of a deed. Probably a reaction to a reviewer not unlike your friend..
Well, the first question is,?ÿ does the law require a deed??ÿ
@aliquot?ÿ
The statute never says deed.?ÿ
Also the county owns the roads in the subdivision.?ÿ
They are a consentor and need to have a consent form sent to them. There is no deed for them either, only the dedication on the plat.?ÿ