AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

How much is 11.74-1/2 chains?

28 Posts
21 Users
0 Reactions
683 Views
Dave Ingram
(@dave-ingram)
Posts: 2140
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Larry

Note the foot mark after the 66 - So spelled out it says 74.5 links can't be more than 66 feet.


 
Posted : April 23, 2015 7:46 pm
stephen-ward
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2244
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Jud

His total is correct, he just hit 7 instead of 4 when he typed 49.17.


 
Posted : April 23, 2015 7:50 pm
mccracker
(@mccracker)
Posts: 340
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Just bring the metal detector and try all of the above!


 
Posted : April 23, 2015 8:45 pm
david-livingstone
(@david-livingstone)
Posts: 1136
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree, the 1/2 is one half of a link. I see that done all the time in my area, although it might be worded a little different.


 
Posted : April 24, 2015 7:09 am
thebionicman
(@thebionicman)
Posts: 4524
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The answer (of course) is, It depends.
Evaluation of terms is an art that is fast disappearing. I have no doubt you (as well as most of us here) know how to do it. The question is, have we formulated a process for interpreting the documents we encounter? The answer is undoubtedly yes though we may not consciously direct it.
When I encounter an undefined term with multiple possible meanings, I apply a simple set of rules before heading out to collect further evidence. They almost always point me the right direction.
Rule 1: Words must always mean what they did when written. Our written and spoken words have changed tremendously in my lifetime. If I don't understand the customs and use of terms when a description is first written, I will NEVER divine the intent of the Deed.
Rule 2: Terms written by a single author at one sitting should be assigned a single meaning. Picking and choosing is disingenuous (and dangerous). Be consistent.
Rule 8: My assigned meaning must not contradict physical evidence. This is the failing point for many of my fellow PLSS Surveyors. When I tromp out to test my theories on the ground, the stake point is subservient to the monuments and actions of owners. At the end of the day I have to swallow my pride and let go of solutions that cannot be true.
Yes, I know I skipped a few. They weren't relevant to the case. Some of you will probably recognize these for what they are. The applied rules of hermeneutics from most seminaries. I would encourage every Surveyor to find a book on the subject and read it through a few times. If nothing else it will help you understand and direct the processes you already use...


 
Posted : April 24, 2015 12:45 pm

bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I tried reading the Wikipedia article on hermeneutics and decided it's a good thing I never tried to study philosophy.
I'll leave it to you and Mr. Fleming.


 
Posted : April 24, 2015 3:03 pm
jud
 jud
(@jud)
Posts: 1918
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

:good:


 
Posted : April 24, 2015 5:52 pm
Brian Allen
(@brian-allen)
Posts: 1570
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Good post Tom. Too many seem to forget that the descriptions function is to guide to the place where we startlooking for the boundary. It seems too many use it to determine where the boundary should have been.


 
Posted : April 25, 2015 1:23 pm
Page 2 / 2