Highrises, camber, superelevation, compression, and scotch

I have spent all day discussing the theoretical aspects of compression in highrise construction. Imagine, if you will, a building composed of a steel perimeter and a concrete core. We have rules of thumb for the anticipated compression of steel and concrete. And, of course, often those rules do not apply. So, here we have one of those situations in which the computations are built upon a theoretical model which violates our rules of thumb. So that you can have an idea of the anatomy about which I shall discourse herein I append a rough sketch.

A corner quadrant.

Now, I seek no guidance or advice, I just feel a need to vent the theoretics.
Steel and concrete will not compress at the same rate and, of course, variables beyond our control also enter into the discussion. More particularly, as relates to concrete. Hence differential compression rates per tier will result in superelevation of the steel beams (as opposed to steel columns). The superelevation for each member, obviously depends, not only upon its length and orientation, but proximity to the perimeter or core. Each beam will also have a camber. Primarily based on length and member size. And our superelevated and cambered beams may have to tie into other superelevated and cambered beams. Consider, as well, rates will vary in structural components, based on loading. Our perimter will not compress at an equal rate to our interior columns until all dead loads are applied. So even our steel compresses at different rates based upon distance from the perimeter. Now, were our theoretical highrise to have elevated floors, we might not worry so much. Adjustments could be made.
If just one of our theoretical engineering computations were to fail, well, you have a fair idea, I suppose, of the resultant chaos.
So now, these considerations apply to each floor and become compounded, obviously, by the number of floors stacked up.
Suppose, we enter in some theoretical numbers then to get an idea.
Let's say, for arguments sake, we have one hundred floors (we do not, but say we do).
And suppose, from experience, reinforced concrete compresses at a rate of 1/8 of an inch per floor. While steel compresses at a rate of 1/16 of an inch per floor.
Now do the math for the bottom and top floors.
Now, just for giggles, assume someone (I would love to use a different noun, but hey, my first amendment rights only go so far) ran a bench in from the street to set elevations.

Now, thank God for a fine glass of 12 year old Jameson.