Notifications
Clear all

Encroachment??

9 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10522
Registered
Topic starter
 

A picture can say a thousand words, but I could only shake my head when I saw this.

Photo taken in Hybe, Slovakia.

(Note, I found this on the Forestery Forum, and just thought it was a "Neat" encroachment!)

🙂

Nate:-)

 
Posted : September 16, 2010 11:46 am
 RFB
(@rfb)
Posts: 1504
Registered
 

FUNNY!

 
Posted : September 16, 2010 11:50 am
(@dan-rittel)
Posts: 458
 

Do you suppose the utility easement contains vertical as well as horizontal dimensions?

 
Posted : September 16, 2010 12:42 pm
(@ryan-versteeg)
Posts: 526
 

I would label that on a map as "possible encroachment" 😉

 
Posted : September 16, 2010 1:59 pm
(@kevin-slottke)
Posts: 17
Registered
 

Now that was funny right there. I don't care who you are.

Thanks for the laugh!

 
Posted : September 17, 2010 4:28 am
(@adamsurveyor)
Posts: 1487
 

> I would label that on a map as "possible encroachment" 😉

But which improvement would you be labeling as the possible encroachment? The building or the overhead line....?

 
Posted : September 17, 2010 2:12 pm
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8761
 

The term "upgrade" never even entered the equation. I know for sure they make longer poles that would rise above the problem.

 
Posted : September 17, 2010 4:52 pm
(@stephen-johnson)
Posts: 2342
 

Not until a court says it is. Until that it is a protrusion.

 
Posted : September 17, 2010 10:44 pm
(@stephen-johnson)
Posts: 2342
 

> Do you suppose the utility easement contains vertical as well as horizontal dimensions?

Dan,

I have seen many easements with vertical elements specifically noted in the written documents, both above and below ground. Does this one??? I wouldn't hazard a guess.

 
Posted : September 17, 2010 10:47 pm