Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Notifications
Clear all
Strictly Surveying
1
Posts
1
Users
0
Reactions
415
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Thence west 456' to co rd and pob;
Thence west 350' to cl crk;
Thence n35w 502', but property line follows creek;
Thence leaving said cl crk e 300' to co rd;
Thence southerly with cl co rd to pob.
Now, I'm working on the rest of the property west of the creek.
I've surveyed the actual creek. Its got about 12 angle points. And acreage varies a little.
What do you think of the above procedure?
The actual survey has brgs and distances to the second, and 0.01'
The biggest problem I can see, is it leaves a non record of the specific location of the creek, at the time, the parcel was created.
I like removing ambiguity. The above method seems to leave more ambiguity.
What do you think?
Thanks, Nate
Posted : March 8, 2023 7:28 pm