Finally finished a large Certificate of Survey. It took about 320 signatures to get everything filed. Whew!
Now it's the County Clerk's problem, she kind of gave me the evil eye as I sat everything on the counter.:-(
what did you do? Re-plat Dubois? Jackson Hole?
No; empty land, no land division for this COS.
6-24x36 sheets-154 corner records-only the ones that didn't already have a record.
They hate those-but we are stuck-have to do them. I've been giving them the corner records in small doses which they are thankful for.
Does the county use stickers for the recording data or are they hand writing each sheet?
I don't think they ever got one like this. The process is to do the recording info on the cover/title sheet which is signed by the surveyor. So I think they will only do the recording info on Sheet 1 of 6. Not sure.
They will send it through the review process-hopefully they won't find anything but the deeds are "messy" to say the least. They may not agree about everything we did. But the client is happy and we talked the title people out of turning it into an ALTA which was really odd.
The 320 signatures were all from this office, two on each corner record and two for the COS, there are no owner signatures for this one since there is no land division.
I was thinking more of them having to file and index each corner rec- you should probably be thinking of sending them a nice poinsetta or something for the holiday season to atone for yourself....
the practice around here used to just put the filing data on one sheet of the COS, but now that most counties use the stickers with bar codes etc., they put a sticker on each sheet. Same document number and COS number but labeling each sheet.
Yeah they put a sticker on each one. They really hate them. And to top it off there is no fee for them in Montucky, which I like butt....
What did they think of your 1":1320' scale and your BOB of "GPS" ? 😉
I actually think 1"=1320' would have worked a bit better for that COS. But I went with 1"=1000'. I really like bearings are assumed but relative best so that's what I used for this one. 😀
I think the gold standard should be: bearings are assumed but relative based on GPS-that would explain everything;-)