Conflicting elements in legal description that calls for a lot and block an additional and unnecessary metes and bound description-

Dane Mince · 2025-01-01T19:49:18Z

The geometry of the plat does not allow for the call of 190' from the the intersection of the SPRR and the westerly line of Plymouth and for that line to also be 175 westerly of Plymouth as it is lot 6's east line coincident with the west line of lot 7. There is some confusion as to what line is the right of way line for SPRR- The railroad land is now a State Highway that is not accessible for surveying. Any evidence of the railroad has long since been destroyed.My question centers on the written record and it proper evaluations. Thanks for your comments- Also I am looking for chapter and verse in some recognized text. thanks for your help and happy new year

Summarize Topic

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Strictly Surveying

Last Post by MightyMoe 1 year ago

21 Posts

11 Users

2 Reactions

1,859 Views

RSS

MightyMoe

(@mightymoe)

Posts: 10534

Member

Translate ▼

I consider that a bounds description.

Posted : January 5, 2025 5:15 pm

Page 2 / 2 Prev

26 Forums
54.5 K Topics
592.1 K Posts
322 Online
16.9 K Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Conflicting elements in legal description that calls for a lot and block an additional and unnecessary metes and bound description-

Please support our supporters!

Our Policies

Quick Links

Support