Sure it is allowed...if the Civil Engineer hired a licensed Land Surveyor to establish or re-establish the location of those property lines and the location of the existing fixed works relative to those property lines.
And he must not have found:
1. Material evidence or physical change, which does not appear on...
2. Material discrepancy...
3. Evidence that, by reasonable analysis, might result in materially alternate positions...
As nothings been filed with the county for that property.
But it's a 1905 map. That's why all the property line dimensions are exactly the same as the tract!
It also looks like there is a possible encroachment issue or possible conflict (alternate position?) with the existing garage overhang near the back corner.
California- Is this allowed? No not really...
I just ratted the guy out to an Architect friend of mine. This guy is a Drafting and Design technician with an art background offering up Architectural services.
I know how hard that industry is suffering. Especially from this type of parasitic meddling. He may be very good at making a plan, but not verifying his work. I'm sure at first sign of trouble its adios!
This should be investigated by the board; both Architects and Surveyors (because of the as-built claim).
:pissed:
California- Is this allowed? No not really...
> This should be investigated by the board; both Architects and Surveyors (because of the as-built claim).
> :pissed:
Since the Executive Officer of the CA Board was the first to respond to this thread, I'd bet that he shot an email over to the head of enforcement right after responding.
California- Is this allowed? No not really...
Egg on my face! I knew that name somewhere lol. :-$
Well I'm going to make an official complaint just to make it even more of an issue. This is the sort of thing that we can't just say "oh well" anymore.
Thanks for the education.