AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Help - Carlson Points Doubled

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
834 Views
stephen-ward
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2244
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm running Carlson Survey 2013 on AutoCAD 2013 and I have one drawing that shows all points doubled. It's as if the individual point attributes and the point group are both being drawn and one is using a different font. The result is what appears to be two points on top of each other with the attributes slightly offset. I've erased and redrawn points, audited the drawing, did a save as on the drawing and everything else I can think of. All other drawings are fine. Any ideas where the setting is hidden or which file to delete to reset the correct point display?


 
Posted : October 22, 2013 8:20 am
Kris Morgan
(@kris-morgan)
Posts: 3855
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I had the same thing happen the other day in 12 in one drawing. I never could figure it out. I just selected the points and hit delete as opposed to going through the delpt steps and saving the crd points. I found that the selecting got the offending issues gone and I redrew the points and all was right in the world.

Delete the gremlin! 🙂


 
Posted : October 22, 2013 8:28 am
va-ls-2867
(@va-ls-2867)
Posts: 525
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sounds like a corrupted point block or maybe annotative text somehow. I would erase the points and purge the blocks, then locate points again.


 
Posted : October 22, 2013 8:29 am
ladd-nelson
(@ladd-nelson)
Posts: 738
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

>I've erased and redrawn points, audited the drawing, did a save as on the drawing and everything else I can think of. All other drawings are fine. Any ideas where the setting is hidden or which file to delete to reset the correct point display?

It almost sounds like a standard attribute block definition has been re-defined in this one drawing. After erasing the points, purge the drawing of any SRVPNO? blocks (the ? is the Attribute Layout ID) and attempt to re-draw the points.


 
Posted : October 22, 2013 8:50 am
stephen-ward
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2244
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks all. I finally got it.

I had tried erasing the points manually then purging all blocks, text styles, and groups with no success but I was using Layer Isolate to isolate the PNTS layer prior to erasure. I switched to manually freezing all layers except the PNT, PNTNO, PNTELEV, and PNTDESC then manually erasing the points and purging as above. The second method must've picked up a holdout that was keeping me from purging the necessary blocks.


 
Posted : October 22, 2013 9:16 am