AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Vertical Curve Design

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
921 Views
field-dog
(@field-dog)
Posts: 1543
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

In preparation for the December CST III exam I watched on YouTube Vertical Curves - Part 1 problem:

grade in = - 4.00%
grade out = + 3.80%
PVI station 52 + 00
PVI elevation = 1261.50'
Railroad crossing station 53 + 50
Railroad crossing elevation = 1271.20'

Design an equal tangent parabolic curve to meet a railroad crossing. I need to solve for the length (L) of the vertical curve. I know the elevation (Y) of the railroad crossing therefore Yrailroad = Ypvc + g1X + (r/2)X^2. The professor fills in the numbers therefore
1271.20 = [1261.50 + 4.00 (L/2)] + [ - 4.00 (L/2 + 1.5)] + [(3.80 + 4.00 / L) (L/2 + 1.5)^2]. The professor simplifies the equation to a quadratic equation. That's where I'm lost. He gets 0.975L^2 - 9.85L + 8.775 = 0. Then L = [ - b +/- SQRT(b^2 - 4ac] / 2a. The answer is 9.1152 stations. Can anyone explain how to simplify the equation to a quadratic equation?


 
Posted : September 18, 2016 9:04 am
mathteacher
(@mathteacher)
Posts: 2242
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Here's a screen shot of the original problem and equation. Your parentheses in the last term do not quite match the equation on the slide.

The trick is to multiply both sides of the equation by the L in the denominator of the last term on the right-hand side of the equation. When you do that and collect terms, you'll have what the professor has.

But, note: He made a change in red whereby he eliminated the 2 in the denominator of that last term. His solution includes the 2. I have no idea whether it belongs there or not; he seemed to indicate that it does not.

No doubt, many readers of this post will know whether the 2 belongs or not.


 
Posted : September 18, 2016 12:37 pm
field-dog
(@field-dog)
Posts: 1543
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks for your help!


 
Posted : September 18, 2016 2:09 pm
field-dog
(@field-dog)
Posts: 1543
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

For those of you interested in investigating this further, Jerry Mahun has a section on Vertical Curve Fitting in his Open Access Library of survey education material at jhttp://errymahun.com/&apos ;">errymahun.com. The curve fitting section is at http://jerrymahun.com/library/Curves/Vertical/B6.htm .


 
Posted : September 19, 2016 7:08 pm