AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Man Fined Nearly $32,000 BY FAA for GPS Jamming Device at Ne

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
399 Views
chuck-s
(@chuck-s)
Posts: 358
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Scary scenario

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2013/08/man_fined_32000_for_blocking_newark_airport_tracking_system.html


 
Posted : August 9, 2013 4:52 am
nate-the-surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10538
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Wow. That makes me curious. What was this device, and what is it for? Can you buy it at wal mart?

I bet this guy had no idea that this was gonna get him in this deep!

N


 
Posted : August 9, 2013 7:35 am
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> Wow. That makes me curious. What was this device, and what is it for? Can you buy it at wal mart?

GPS jammers are illegal in the U.S., and with some high-profile cases in recent years the cheap ones are harder to find now. As I recall, they used to be available for under $50 on eBay a few years back. If you want to spend $120, you can get one from Jammer-Store in Sweden. I did find a cheap one on eBay, though it claims to have a very limited range. I'm dubious as to that claim, so maybe that's just the seller's way of trying to get around U.S. law.


 
Posted : August 9, 2013 8:08 am
bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

He should have covered the receiving antenna with aluminum foil. Probably effective, if it would stay on, and very cheap.

It would probably take the effort and cost of a pretty good tight metal enclosure to keep the signal weak enough to only affect receivers for a few yards. Just generating the signal right on frequency in a cheap box could spray out many times the power needed for his purpose.

If you ever played around with two AM radios in the same house, you might have noticed that one could be tuned 455 kHz off of a distant station that the other one was receiving and generate a bad whistle. That was because the local oscillator used in the second receiver would spray around unintentionally and cause the interference. They didn't intentionally transmit that interfering signal, but it was pretty strong.


 
Posted : August 9, 2013 9:53 am