> I don't disagree, but it doesn't answer the question. There isn't suddenly a problem to solve. >Kind of getting into semantics... I don't know...

>we do live in exciting times...agreed!

:good:

Plumb,I was in error. The new Triumph-2 receiver does not track L5, however, as you recalled from the spec sheet, the Triumph-1 has always tracked L5,...

Gavin,There was an interesting article about a year ago in GPS World about a technique that used two antennas under canopy (perhaps a meter apart). Se...

Maybe you and Mr. Sibole could get together sometime...As for L5 being of use in the field. I don't know. It's getting there, but those old satellites...

what part of the country are you in?

you're so cynical... 😉 Most receivers, particularly of old, don't use GLONASS for the final solution because it was always considered less precise t...

good question. I'll see what I can find out.

The issue with GLONASS becomes significant if you mix base and rover. My understanding is that the Javad receivers treat each GLONASS signal uniquely ...

> The old Triumph 1 could also track L5...Not according to Javad.

:good: +1

Part of the issue is that Localization really performs two operations. One, it creates a projection and additional rotation, scale, and planar tilt (i...

what coordinate do you have for your base?