Last seen: March 14, 2025 3:27 pm
From my own observations in optimal environments at various ranges, I've found my RTK system provides <1cm+1ppm accuracy (2D) at 95%. Two points po...
For 2D, the multiplier from 1 sigma to 2 sigma is about 1.6 not 2.
Yes. Please share them.
What are the standards in Texas?
Apparently you discovered a point of diminishing returns in increasing your total station accuracy. At some point practicality caused you to select a ...
Kent McMillan, post: 383644, member: 3 wrote: The point, though, remains that there is virtually no situation in which RTK will give better positional...
Lee D, post: 383623, member: 7971 wrote: Site Calibrations, or Transformations, or Localizations, or whatever your software of choice calls them can b...
Kent, that's quite a leap, even for you.
Kent McMillan, post: 383599, member: 3 wrote: Accuracy was the point of contention, not speed.You may have imported that contention into my thread, bu...
Kent McMillan, post: 383590, member: 3 wrote: Actually, the problems with RTK use are well known. Since its main appeal is speed, why is it a surprise...
MightyMoe, post: 383581, member: 700 wrote: The improvements regarding accuracy and more important reliability have made RTK a better tool than even a...
Lee D, post: 383586, member: 7971 wrote: I've been through countless GPS training classes over the years, as either a student or a trainer, and most o...
Kent McMillan, post: 383579, member: 3 wrote: Yes, that is RTK in a nutshell. Until RTK users are able to maintain anything resembling the sort of pro...
2xcntr, post: 383434, member: 584 wrote: "I don't have it in me to argue with your irrational opinions about RTK for surveying."Really?? Then why woul...
Kent McMillan, post: 383442, member: 3 wrote: However, the positions of the control points had variances associated with them that should have been ad...
The samples were not on the same day. One control point (at 9.5 miles) was created using OPUS Projects, the other (at 2.55 miles) by static GPS from s...
Why start injecting "reasonable" into the argument, Kent? What's "reasonable" about quibbling over 3mm compared to 8mm in the context of boundary surv...
Ok. You've started in with the "what you're saying is" already.
I don't have it in me to argue with your irrational opinions about RTK for surveying. You've demonstrated nothing regarding comparative accuracies of ...
Surely the insurance company will understand when you send them the picture as part of your claim for a new base.