Well said David !!!

I see that it should be a proportional division (NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4) to be a an "aliquot parts", but as this description (so far) contains no "bound...

You have the beginnings of an "aliquot parts" description.

There should be a law !!!

I'm with My felllowAlso, shouldn't your fee reflect your liability?

Just checked that thread. All good stuff. I have found that the strength or weakness of the "180" angle still holds even with our more precise equipme...

I have encountered a somewhat similar situation. the "error" is most likely in your conventional traverse, where the measured angles are close to 180°...

This is another good argument against the one man survey crew.

We are using this adage: "We aren't the cheapest surveyor and don't care to be. If you desire a professional survey at a reasonable fee, that's us". A...

I'm not clear on your statement.

Just tried to use the site and... yeah, no go...:-@

Question: Is their need to only add / revise the parties certified to? Or are they also in need of the "survey date" being current?

Did that as crew chief back in the 80's. The Sub was the second phase and numbered as "II", in roman numerals. The lot to be surveyed was number 11 (e...

If I'm reading your situation correctly, I would show the valve easement by its recorded information and so state the information. I would show the pi...

I had a similar call myself today as our fee was double that of the fool... fellow surveyor. I explained to the caller that with us, Elevations Certif...

Hence the saying, “tag, you’re it!” 😉