After spending Thousands in Surveying fees this Student has learned several things, no difinite answer and depending on ones location you are at the m...
Very good,I deem this good quality information. The County has now recognized the 3.8,with the exception of a Boundary line agreement with our Neighbo...
Kent McMillan, post: 393676, member: 3 wrote: That isn't provided in the Subdivision Regulations, though, unless you are claiming ownership of the lan...
IKent McMillan, post: 393667, member: 3 wrote: The issues that you're dealing with relate to a particular scheme of land development that apparently h...
Kent McMillan, post: 393667, member: 3 wrote: The issues that you're dealing with relate to a particular scheme of land development that apparently ha...
ThKent McMillan, post: 393665, member: 3 wrote: Actually, the San Marcos-Blanco Road was probably an easement only. The quitclaim instrument executed ...
SKent McMillan, post: 393662, member: 3 wrote: BTW, I wouldn't get too far out on a limb in claiming that the original land grant lines shown in some ...
Kent McMillan, post: 393659, member: 3 wrote: So, this isn't really a surveying problem at all, but a land development problem, i.e. buying a 10.04 ac...
Kent McMillan, post: 393659, member: 3 wrote: So, this isn't really a surveying problem at all, but a land development problem, i.e. buying a 10.04 ac...
Kent McMillan, post: 393574, member: 3 wrote: This is not a difficult problem. The real question is when your land and the adjoining land owned by the...
Steven Roessner, post: 393630, member: 9988 wrote: Hey all,per the conversation everyone is having about gaps I had this tucked away in my records as ...
Kent McMillan, post: 393646, member: 3 wrote: Actually, I suspect that the "problem" is that the poster wants to claim that his 10 acres consists of o...
Steven Roessner, post: 393630, member: 9988 wrote: Hey all,per the conversation everyone is having about gaps I had this tucked away in my records as ...
Yes, after extensive research the County Engineer has finally agreed to acknowledge the 3.8 tract as being within the 10.04 tract exceptnow, I need a ...
Kent McMillan, post: 393646, member: 3 wrote: Actually, I suspect that the "problem" is that the poster wants to claim that his 10 acres consists of o...
RPlumb314, post: 393486, member: 6313 wrote: The survey plat you have posted of the called 3.8-acre tract is marked "Preliminary." Do you have the fi...
In 2000, the Surveyor cut out 58 acres out of a Parent tract,subsequently in 2012 the same Surveyor cut out our 10 acre tract out of the same parent t...
thebionicman, post: 393464, member: 8136 wrote: Every State has a slightly different 'solution' in cases like this. Most of them would hinge on the De...
Michael harwell, post: 393431, member: 11340 wrote: Here is the Surveyors response to me:We did performed, according to TAC 663.16 research of adequat...
A Harris, post: 393417, member: 81 wrote: The intent of the Grantor will decide where the boundary exists.A proper metes and bounds description should...