Certainly. The manual is well thumbed by many surveyors out here. I think that Mr. Lucas has made a blanket statement that passes for Alabama but is n...

There are plenty of places in the NW which are whole townships of raw forest land, where no one other than original GLO surveyors and loggers (60 year...

Once a corner is lost proportioning is appropriate. If it's only obliterated there are other options.

The Interstate highways in Oregon were built in the 1950's and miles of their right of way are lined with t-post fences.

In terms of damage and lossDidn't mean to be insulting. Loosing a book is nothing, in comparison.

I'll stick with "when", Ed. There are problems. They will be overcome.

It is true that when the "recession" is over there are going to be a lot less people in this profession. Those that survive will be the most efficient...

In terms of damage and lossTwo moves is about the same as one fire.

Richard, you are guilty of assuming a fact that is not in evidence. The question is whether the fence, by its very existence, without further circumst...

As I've posted below, we are not talking about the occupation of the whole property, we are talking about the occupation of a strip of land between th...

The fence could have been built by one owner to retain livestock or something without an intention for it to be a boundary fence. Any occupation that ...

That's not adverse possession. What you are suggesting is Practical Location. If the owners, at any time and in ignorance of the true location of the ...

The mere existence of the fence isn't the important part. What the owners did in the vicinity of that fence is. Is it just a brushy wilderness around ...

I rather tend to agree with the dissent as well. But there is this mitigating factor - Proctor also built without a survey. If his skirts had been cle...

In the appelate court case (192 P.3d 958, 146 Wn.App. 836, 2008) there was testimony about how the subdivider had shown both of these owners (at diffe...

$25,000 was the value that an appraiser assigned to the parcel in the appellate court proceedings.

Washington State law (RCW 7.28.085) forestalls adverse possession on forest land unless substantial improvements have been made by the possessor. So t...