AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
loyal
loyal
@loyal
Free
Joined: July 2, 2010 11:11 pm
Last seen: June 28, 2026 8:47 pm
Topics: 212 / Replies: 3523
Reply
RE: GPS in urban canyons

Larry Best, post: 395050, member: 763 wrote: No, not ALL of us. There are surveyors who work under the assumption that the earth is flat. That assumpt...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: GPS in urban canyons

John Hamilton, post: 394911, member: 640 wrote: As much as some people want to do only GPS nowadays, this sounds like a job where a total station woul...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Original Stone Monument

That's a beauty, fer sure!

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Adverse Possession in PLSS

aliquot, post: 394619, member: 2486 wrote: Although the term averse possession is used, this is not averse possession as we think about it under state...

10 years ago
Topic
Replies: 16
Views: 1391
Reply
RE: A Gneiss Bearing Rock

Gene,I am so fricking jealous!We do a major happy dance IF we can find the rotted remains of a Bearing Tree/Stump or wood post in a mound of stone!Asi...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: A Gneiss Bearing Rock

Those are beautiful Gene, and the tranquil setting is nice too.Keep'em coming buddy.Loyal

10 years ago
Reply
RE: A Gneiss Bearing Rock

On the subject of Mineral Survey accessories, we have yet to encounter a BO (Bearing Object) or BR (Bearing Rock) on any of the 3-4 dozen Mineral Surv...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: A Gneiss Bearing Rock

Wow...that's a gneiss one Gene!:cool:Loyal

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Getting into GPS

Nate The Surveyor, post: 393729, member: 291 wrote: Thanks Jim.It took me a bit to figure out ppm.... But after figuring it out, i liked it's brevity....

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Kent McMillan, post: 393533, member: 3 wrote: I think that the answer is that in most normal urban areas the error introduced in ignoring the orthomet...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Kent McMillan, post: 393529, member: 3 wrote: Just out of curiosity, what do you think the maximum error introduced by ignoring the orthometric height...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Kent McMillan, post: 393523, member: 3 wrote: I'm trying to think of a public works project involving fluid flow over a distance of about 7 miles wher...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

In fact, IF one really wants the best results, you would use the BEST gravity model available (not the NAVD88 gravity Model), and compute geopotential...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Bill93, post: 393517, member: 87 wrote: I guess it doesn't matter on this project, but for critical tolerance on fluid flow, I would think they should...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Jim Frame, post: 393505, member: 10 wrote: I know, I headed up the project that established their bluebooked heights. (I had a lot of help from Don D...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Jim Frame, post: 393500, member: 10 wrote: AI5051DK4487JS4556 You're right Jim, the ortho corrections are ZERO between these stations.On the other ha...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Jim Frame, post: 393492, member: 10 wrote: The gravity field is pretty consistent around here, so I don't think the ortho height correction is going t...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

You can get a pretty good handle on the 'what-if' by using the NGS program LVL-DH (linked below) and the 3 Bench Marks mentioned in the opening post.Y...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Vertical Accuracy & Clueless Clients

Kent McMillan, post: 393418, member: 3 wrote: That does sound like a pretty "clean" job with digital level and Star*Lev.Maybe!Unless things have chang...

10 years ago
Page 89 / 187