Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Man I love the ignore function on this board now!
So what you're saying is that Kent isn't qualified enough to occupy that position. That's gold! 🙂
This is an excellent time for [USER=3]@Kent McMillan[/USER] to actually put his money where is mouth is and go and apply for the chief surveyor positi...
It is well founded in case law that the surveyor is supposed to be viewed as doing what he said he did. Proof to the contrary is needed. So, in that...
Kent McMillan, post: 343732, member: 3 wrote: Well, professionals know the reason for rules and do not apply the rules in a way that defeats their pur...
No. Your definition of overhead is wrong. With respect, there are many other things, such as fixed costs, variable costs, et cetera, that do not fal...
It was just a number I threw out.
Not if somewhere cap is noted and more particularly described. Then it would be acceptable shorthand.
Sorry, but if the rules promulgate it, then it is assumed it was done, with respect to the capping. We can only be judged on the rules in place and no...
According to the cost accounting class in college, overhead is defined as anything that is consumable and small. Hammers wouldn't fit into it, but la...
They removed that little ditty from the regs didn't they? 🙂 I have an old copy where it did say "fully describe", but no seems to be redacted for ...
There appear to be two schools of thought on this matter. RULE å¤663.17 (d) Where practical, all monuments set by a Professional Land Surveyor to del...
It's mean. I've drug deer through them in South Texas and wished I hadn't when I got done. Think of a locust, only mad, with the thorns that break o...
I thought we were talking about traverse lines. Presumably, if one is on another's property, then there is either a right of entry or permission has ...