Warren Smith, post: 432982, member: 9900 wrote: The ramifications of the increase in productivity become evident, vis-a-vis business models, both prov...

paden cash, post: 432825, member: 20 wrote: This post actually brings up a question I've mulled around in my mind from time to time. And my inquiry i...

Tom Adams, post: 432887, member: 7285 wrote: Of course, that begs the question as to how to deal with original corner monuments that appear to have mi...

In the Austin area, there are basically two soil conditions. West of the Balcones Fault, on the Edwards Plateau, the ground is limestone of some varie...

Richard, post: 432834, member: 833 wrote: I tend to agree with Paden's comments and yet as you say Kent, future generations are at risk of measurement...

The main thing that I see in play in the future is that an entire generation of surveyors will arrive to continue the work who are so preoccupied by r...

paden cash, post: 432825, member: 20 wrote: This post actually brings up a question I've mulled around in my mind from time to time. And my inquiry i...

And, of course, what I meant to type was:"A resurvey in 1951 found the distance between what were judged to be the rock mounds marking the corners of ...

Jim Frame, post: 432819, member: 10 wrote: Not according to the manual, at least for C records: I have long assumed that PH records are treated the s...

Dave Karoly, post: 432812, member: 94 wrote: There is a PH for 31 which is a lat long to the nearest second only which may explain it.That is plausibl...

Dave Karoly, post: 432810, member: 94 wrote: What does StarNet do with C and PH records without either !!! or *** or standard errors?It applies the de...

Yes, that makes sense. Just to back up a bit, were the values in the "C" lines entered for the sole purpose of adding descriptors taken from the GPS-o...

Jim Frame, post: 432805, member: 10 wrote: Here are the results of processing with GPS only. These were mostly RTK, with a handful of very short (5-m...

John Hamilton, post: 432709, member: 640 wrote: I remember in the days before Star*Net was bought out that Ron Sawyer (I think that was his name) had ...

I think that I'd be interested to know how the RTK vectors were weighted if the RTK tie to Pt. 12 is what determined the uncertainty of the direction ...

Mark Mayer, post: 432789, member: 424 wrote: I went through Jim's data And edited all those ? lines to DV's, which is what I'm familiar with. But It d...

Jim Frame, post: 432787, member: 10 wrote: Those From-At-From M lines result from conversion of the raw data, and they're present for all of the sets ...

My guess is that the problem was created by this line:#M 12-31-12 ? 65.246 90.0633 5.022/5.000 'FND BHM 12-31...

Jim Frame, post: 432632, member: 10 wrote: I'm scratching my head over this one, so I'm hoping someone can explain it for me. ...Can someone clue me i...