Rivers v LozeauWhat really got screwed was the concept of the Public Land Survey System by Judges that have no idea of what they decided on.
Would it not be a hoot if BLM Cadastral Management decided that this State Court Case was not in the interest of BLM?And they even convinced the Direc...
Don't be sorry; it is an important case, even tho the most abominable case that I have ever read.The language used by the court only demonstrated that...
Rivers v LozeauSorry, you are right!
Dave & LeonI think that Lozeau simply did not have competent legal advice or competent expert surveyor advice.Lozeau was screwed!
Do you have two monuments apart at a distance of 0.28'?
I think if a measuring technician called me and told me my monument was off 0.28', I would have the same reaction!Keith
Rivers v LozeauTalk about assumptions!Very little of what you post is public information.
Rivers v LozeauI would believe that you are right in your assumptions on how this "proven corner" was noted. It is the exact reason why BLM has the p...
Rivers v Lozeauso let me get this straight. 1948 Moorhead survey finds original corner, takes new BTs then for some unknown reason he sets a mathmatic...
Rivers v LozeauToo bad that somebody with standing did not officially protest the BLM resurvey on the west 1/4 sec. cor. and let IBLA have a hearing ...
Rivers v LozeauYou have nailed it Pseudo and is why I keep hammering on the bogus theory that only takes the protracted lines as evidence of those lin...
TomI am sure you are right and even though I don't have the first subd. of sec. survey plat, I would bet that their monuments line up with that "other...
Rivers v LozeauThe document, once again, is from the 2012 supplement to "Clark on Surveying", Section 30.10. This section provides the author's first ...
Rivers v LozeauWell you are right about that, and the losing side lost their case because of it.
Rivers v LozeauWhether you want to believe it or not, it was their west 1/4 cor. that mucked up the section.Period!
