Dan and Steve, you are both an inspiration to me. You both are "Surveyor's Surveyors" and the state is very lucky to have you two. Thank you very mu...

Thanks Dan. Doesn't a city annexation require a an accurate, complete, and specific description? So what happens now? It seems to me that the Gener...

Put this on the ground: A part of Section 26, Township 15 North, Range 27 West of the Fifth Principal.... Less and except parcel numbers 100-00045-0...

This is mainly brought up to compound the fear of shape files that Steve exhibits. Maybe we don't have to tie our survey to these monuments, maybe we...

J. Scott Graber, post: 324307, member: 10104 wrote: A.C.A. § 15-21-307 15-21-307. Proximity to stations required for recording.No coordinates based o...

corey f, post: 324300, member: 287 wrote: What law are you talking about? A.C.A. § 15-21-307

I am dropping the AICP thing. Figure this out for yourselves.

corey f, post: 324300, member: 287 wrote: What law are you talking about?I live in Northwest Arkansas where first and second order monuments hardly ex...

On copyright, all of their arguments failed to take into account the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. Before that, copyright was based on fi...

I remember Steve and Dan. Steve was worried about the shape files then. By the new law, our surveys tied to grid would have to come from 15 miles aw...

GIS is not the problem. AICP is the problem. Anyone heard of that?

As quoted from the Washington County Public Map System: " Washington County Public Map System County Disclaimer: These maps were created by Washington...