AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
dmyhill
dmyhill
@dmyhill
Member Sustainer
Joined: January 26, 2011 4:49 pm
Last seen: July 29, 2026 3:48 pm
Topics: 176 / Replies: 2912
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@norman-oklahoma The Leica equipment will "fit" anything...but they are not suitable for many Topcon Robots. You need Topcon tribrachs, and you need ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@350rocketmike My experience is that Leica or any of them need to regularly have the robotic aiming calibrated. This should be done by field crews of...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting (and sort of funny) article on UAV accuracy checks

And to follow up...if you had a large site, and you wanted to be ACCURATE to a certain benchmark, RTK might be exactly the tool for the job. The preci...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting (and sort of funny) article on UAV accuracy checks

@dan-steely Getting under 0.05' vertical overall from a benchmark or datum can be difficult, but what I like about total station work is that relativ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Books on projections, coord systems

This is why every call to a datum should include physical monuments that you can check to on the ground to verify that you are in fact on the same dat...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

Is that using robotics? Is it a pointing error?

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@lukenz 5" at 500 feet is 0.01'...the size of the job or the contract or the company doesn't change that. Most instruments do not have the optical re...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting (and sort of funny) article on UAV accuracy checks

@rover83 ?ÿ Some of the main advantages of remote sensing and specifically photo based surveys are speed, safety, and that it obtains data that I do...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Books on projections, coord systems

@mathteacher Understanding Software is exactly it. And I swear every manufacture has a different jargon and a different expected workflow. ?ÿ ?ÿ

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@mark-mayer Pick the software first. 100%

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@brad-ott In practice, a name brand 5" instrument will produce the same results as a 1" instrument on any boundary survey up to and including a full ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: TS16 vs TS13 vs S5 vs Geomax/Carlson zoom 90

@lukenz 5" is more than adequate for most boundaries. We rarely have traverses longer enough to tell the difference between 5" and 1".

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Error in survey? Who's responsible

If it was just math anyone could do my job.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Error in survey? Who's responsible

I am posting this on the wall.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Avoiding mistakes when not traversing?

@350rocketmike IF you use Field to Finish, simply code the check point to a different code. Simply putting it in Raw Data is a recipe to have someone...

5 years ago
Reply
5 years ago
Reply
RE: Error in survey? Who's responsible

Pins are good. Hire a surveyor. I think your questions warrant an expert opinion from someone with all the facts. If you provided all the facts here, ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Avoiding mistakes when not traversing?

If you do a topo, and the map includes the two stations, and their physical descriptions as well as the bearing or azimuth you assumed between the two...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: ELECTRONIC FILE TRANSFER AGREEMENT Language

@leegreen Interesting. They should have station and offsets at least. The dimensions are usually in the details. I suppose every area is different.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Optimum Field Crew Set-up

BTW, my crews don't seem to care about paper anymore.

5 years ago
Page 56 / 155