> Are they set so the bound corner is on the property line, with the intent to have entire monument within the property?That would've been my guess...

Yes we are dealing with fee and prescriptive rights-of-way, in two different jurisdictions. This property is located on a river and lies in two state...

It sounds like you handled him well.I always try to make contact with adjoiners before beginning work on a boundary survey. One, because it's require...

We are in a similar situation and it seems this has come up over the last few winters. Our MO has been to use it as fill-in work (when appropriate). ...

regulation of surveyingThe law in each state is for the regulation of surveying. It requires a surveyor's license to be a third party that sets a mon...

> ...What happens when these two land owners both sell to some unsuspecting buyers?? should they be held to the idiocy of the previous owners?? ...

Those "what if's" are things that I would look at before accepting the monument. There is no law anywhere that says that a surveyor is the only perso...

Regardless of where it originated, if the landowners have accepted the monument as representing their common corner, who is the surveyor to disagree w...

The nature of their conflict isn't with the location of the corners. They both know where the corners are. A dispute has arisen from a wall that one...

You should know that (and everything else about that monument) before deciding to reject it.

By rejecting the existing monument and setting a new one, you are stating that it isn't a monument. Therefore, there would be no law against removing...

Calling J.B. Stahl> So if I use the above information -> > The NC Boards ruling that Surveyors must not determine Title issues has no bearing...

Title doesn't change but the boundary does.