AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Brian Allen
Brian Allen
@brian-allen
Member
Joined: March 8, 2011 3:00 pm
Topics: 25 / Replies: 1545
Reply
RE: Accept or reject?

> > No need to tell the north adjoiner anything.> > I'm not going to tell him, Non-bending Senior Line Surveying Inc. will tell him though...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Accept or reject?

No need to tell the north adjoiner anything. If you performed your search for evidence you already have discovered that he knew the line was where it...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Accept or reject?

clearcutThe 2009 Manual addresses the changes of policy in closing corners. It is a fairly recent development.

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Where did this come from:

Let's make it real simpleThe concept is correct when referring to "what is the boundary". For example if I own lot 3, I cannot sell any part of lot 4...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Accept or reject?

Ditto Adamsurveyor.

14 years ago
Reply
RE: BLM Moving Monuments

> ...but things get hairy when the BLM breaks down the section to set interior corners. Once the exterior corners are established, the BLM seems t...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: What is the right way to do the wrong thing?

> This seems correct since following the instructions is part of re-surveying and you cannot re-survey something that was never done. > WHOA the...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: What is the right way to do the wrong thing?

> If the GLO did not establish this position in the original survey and it is sombody's best guess, then the difference between this mon and the st...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Govt. Lot Description

I think it would depend on the patent date. He was apparently there in 1873, after the first survey, but before the 1877 survey. If it was patented ...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Advice for new liscensees

> Sounds like good advice. It's funny you should mention this right now, because I got a call earlier today about a boundary that's being question...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting opinion from Idaho

> This is the final 2 paragraphs from Marek v. Lawrence:> > "I concur in the Court's opinion. Judge Bradbury clearly erred in concluding in h...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: description for an easement

Lets see what a court said in a very recent decision (your state may be different):Machado v Ryan, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket N...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Labor Law Question

I'm not sure it is legal or not, but assuming that it is legal (which I tend to doubt), I do know there is no law requiring the employees of the compa...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Worst Instrument

The worst instrument is any instrument (including GPS) in the hands of someone who doesn't have a clue what they're doing. Or worst yet, someone who ...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary hypothetical

I'd really like to see a court decision, for my library, supporting your view that a boundary line agreement changes the descriptions of the lands inv...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary hypothetical

Carl, Your comments would certainly be true in the case of a boundary line adjustment. A boundary line agreement is a whole different animal. I'll ...

14 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary hypothetical

Carl,I'm not understanding why a boundary line agreement would require new descriptions for both parcels. A boundary line adjustment or any other for...

14 years ago
Page 65 / 79