Sounds like the party doing the developing still had control of the land, if they were clearing fence, etc.?ÿ Did the party on the other side do anyth...

>I have no problem with closure How do you define closure on GPS data?  I didn't think that term was commonly used in that context.  Do ...

Iowa has a fairly short acquiescence statute and Dad's been gone for 16 years.?ÿ The land now belongs to my sister's son and my cousin.

I saw a DIY instance.?ÿ My dad and uncle inherited Grandma's 80, and described their split split by aliquot parts SW SW and SE SW, so no survey needed...

The rules constrain you in about everything except choice of the two observation points and your calculation sequence.?ÿ Preparation will win the day....

I can't imagine any reason except silly bureaucratic whims for not accepting that state's license as sufficient qualification regardless of where the ...

Well, all the original monuments, agreed to and set by the parties to the transaction, are probably there.?ÿ You have found some and the rest should b...

His questions seem to me to be basic issues of liability for a survey, whether time or transfer of the property dissolves that liability, and what rea...

Just copy and paste the URL.  I usually enter it both as the text and the link so people know where it is going.

You can't directly get coordinates.  If you break down what the GNSS system is doing to give you those point coordinates, you are really measurin...

The common designations I've seen are (R) for record, meaning numbers on the deed or prior plat and (M) for values determined by measurement during th...

I'd think the test would be the quality shown by the OPUS report, in terms of pk-pk spread, % used, etc.  If in your experience you don't think y...