Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Big D
@big-d-2
Registered
Joined: August 2, 2020 7:04 pm
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

Some of you are misunderstanding who and what i am trying to illustrate. It IS extremely complex. Multiple suveyors ARE involved. MUCH money already e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

@dooryardsurveyor?ÿ Will add my BIG D comments and observations to your reply in CAPS WITHIN YOUR REPLY FOR CLARITY. A lot of people before me have ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

@rover83?ÿ I know what i feel about "property plan(s)", but why do you call them an "abomination"??

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

That makes the most sense. However..... When dimensions get changed by a surveyor's "property plan" with a "missed leg" and a corresponding "closure e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

Not an attorney. It would probably make life a lot smoother around other people and their agendas....

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

In this case the "magic point" according to the previous owner's original family from the 1930s is a steel rod placed at the then center line of the r...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

The day of creation deed has the boundary corner (as was standard of the 1930s) being the mid point in the road easement (now increased up to 50 feet ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

@bill93 Sorry... It is a metes and bounds - PA

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

@lurker It is a easement that the county did not pay anyone for. AKA "fee paid". The ROW edge corners increase the lot sizes.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW vs Property Line Corner POBs

This is a no fee paid easement under the original "road act" of 1802. The original deed of the 1930s states the middle of the road where the metal rod...

3 years ago
Topic
Replies: 37
Views: 6
Reply
RE: Can an iron rod without a cap be an official marker?

If you are in a metes and bounds type of system where original boundaries were set by the very hard work of dragging chains and cutting paths to produ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: ROW Changes Over Time vs Property Corners

In this area and possibly many areas, if you are doing work for only a few hundred dollars or a "multi discount" for more than one owner there is no t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Sequential Subdivisions Scrivener Error in Deed = Modern Day Problems

@aliquot   You got that exactly right! Lazy and cowardly. The majority of time a century or two later for a "complete and accurate survey" as r...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Sequential Subdivisions Scrivener Error in Deed = Modern Day Problems

@paul-in-pa  What a great account of how important research and property rights are when taken back correctly to the very beginning! Your fathe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Sequential Subdivisions Scrivener Error in Deed = Modern Day Problems

@mike-marks "Ultimately, area or quantity remains at the bottom of the list for a very legitimate reason—despite the disappointment it will cau...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Sequential Subdivisions Scrivener Error in Deed = Modern Day Problems

@aliquot The metes and bounds states have a lot of surveyors who do "deed stake outs" based on the near in time deed or deeds. They don't go back to ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Sequential Subdivisions Scrivener Error in Deed = Modern Day Problems

@mike-marks Meaning that when you do the geometry and how the angles and lines add up of the senior parcel the closing error is zero on the first but...

4 years ago
Topic
Replies: 8
Views: 4
Page 1 / 2