Ask A Surveyor
If you are a landowner seeking advice from surveyors, please post your questions and issues here.... View more
Organizer:
- Organized by
-
Device to find azimuth of antenna face
Device to find azimuth of antenna face
@mathteacher OK. It appears I’m screwed if someone asks me to put their data on Geographic North. How does one make the correction from Geodetic to Geographic?
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
On second thought, Geographic must be the result of a Solar?
ChatGPT said:
astronomical north, also called celestial north or astronomical true north, refers to the direction of the celestial north pole. It is determined by the Earth’s rotation axis extended into space and intersects with the celestial sphere
I disagree.
Astro north is what you observe from celestial bodies and bring down to the horizon without correcting for the deflection of the vertical at your location.
Then after applying the LaPlace correction you get a good estimate of geodetic/geographic north.
The ChatGPT definition doesn’t make sense because it is nearly identical to geodetic.
.
Well, my question really required a follow-up:
So, is true north geographic north or geodetic north?ChatGPTTrue north is generally considered synonymous with geographic north. In most practical applications, the term “true north” refers to the direction towards the geographic North Pole along the Earth’s surface.
True north is determined by the Earth’s rotation axis and is independent of the irregularities in the Earth’s shape and gravity. It provides a reference for navigation, mapping, and general orientation.
While there is a small angular difference between the true north (geographic north) and the geodetic north due to the irregular shape of the Earth and the effects of gravity, for most purposes, this distinction is negligible. True north is widely used as a practical and convenient reference direction, and it is typically considered to align with the lines of longitude on maps and in navigation.
In summary, when people use the term “true north,” they are generally referring to geographic north, which is the direction towards the North Pole along the Earth’s surface.
I don’t know what to say, other than my brushes with the celestial sphere in Spherical Trig are consistent with ChatGPT. How that plays with observations, I don’t know. If I stand at the end of my driveway and look over my across-the-street neighbor’s roof, I can see Polaris, but that’s the extent of my celestial observing.
ChatGPT is always ready to discuss such things, but it is stubborn, so you sometimes have to bore in on the topic with successive questions.
In any event, it’s an exceptional learning tool that’s likely to shake many long-held beliefs in many different fields.
This may help:
How do I reconcile geodetic north and astronomical north?ChatGPTTo reconcile geodetic north and astronomical north at a specific location, you can use a process known as astronomical azimuth determination. This involves making observations of celestial objects to determine the angular difference between the geodetic north (local vertical) and astronomical north (celestial north pole). Here’s a general overview of the steps involved:
Set up Observations: Choose a suitable location and time for the observations. Ensure that the sky is clear and free from obstructions that could obstruct the view of celestial objects.
Select Reference Stars: Identify and select reference stars near the celestial north pole. These stars should be well-documented and have accurate celestial coordinates available.
Determine Azimuths: Using specialized astronomical equipment such as a theodolite or a total station, measure the azimuths (horizontal angles) from the reference stars to the geodetic north (local vertical). This is typically done by aligning the instrument to the reference stars and measuring their angles relative to a reference direction, such as a plumb line.
Calculate Difference: Compare the measured azimuths to the expected azimuths based on the known celestial coordinates of the reference stars. Calculate the angular difference between the measured azimuths and the astronomical north.
Apply Correction: Apply the calculated angular difference as a correction to reconcile the geodetic north (local vertical) with the astronomical north. This correction can be considered as an adjustment to align the local vertical with the direction of the celestial north pole.
It’s important to note that the process described above requires specialized astronomical equipment and expertise in celestial observations. It is typically carried out in precise geodetic surveys or in cases where accurate alignment between geodetic north and astronomical north is necessary, such as in astronomical observatories or celestial navigation applications.
For general navigation and mapping purposes, the difference between geodetic north and astronomical north is often negligible and can be disregarded.
Useless drivel. It still doesn’t mention deflection of the vertical or Laplace correction, which any surveying textbook would discuss in this regard.
ChatGPT is dangerous because it appears so slick and authoritative but often gets things wrong.
There are stories out there of a lawyer who used it to find cases to cite. He was quite embarrassed and probably censured because some of the cases ChatGPT listed did not actually exist.
I’ve told my story of asking it about author Robert Heinlein. It said he was married three times, which I cannot find anywhere else, and it gave his third marriage year as later than his death year.
People complain about Wikipedia not being a good source, but it is head and shoulders over ChatGPT. Most wrong info on Wikipedia gets corrected by someone who knows.
.Now, Bill, it’s easy to scoff at something inhuman but perhaps not wise to dismiss it. After all, not many people are still lugging around Gunter’s chains. And aren’t there also stories of people driving into the ocean while following GPS? People misuse all sorts of tools.
Consider this phrase from the ChatGPT reply: “…to the geodetic north (local vertical).” Isn’t it true that the local vertical is the plumb line, a vertical unadjusted for deflection of the vertical? And isn’t it clear that the difference between astronomical north and geodetic north is the adjustment due to variations in local vertical; ie, the deflection of the vertical?
And doesn’t that make sense?
On the other hand, judging by this question from the FS practice exam, AI is not ready to take anyone’s job:
For a symmetrical 400-foot sag vertical curve with PC station at 1+00, initial grade of -1.00% and final grade of +3.00%, at what station is the low point on the curve located?ChatGPTTo determine the station at which the low point is located on a symmetrical vertical curve, we need to calculate the station at the vertex (V) of the curve. The vertex is the point where the curve transitions from the descending grade to the ascending grade.
Given information:
- PC station: 1+00
- Initial grade: -1.00% (descending)
- Final grade: +3.00% (ascending)
- Curve length: 400 feet (symmetrical)
First, let’s find the station at the vertex (V) of the curve.
Length of the descending grade (D) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet Length of the ascending grade (A) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet
To find the station at the vertex (V), we need to determine the length from the PC to the vertex (L).
L = D / (Initial grade) = 200 feet / (-1.00%) = 200 feet / (-0.01) = 20,000 feet
The station at the vertex (V) is calculated by adding the length (L) to the PC station.
Station at V = PC station + L = 1+00 + 20,000 feet = 21+00
Therefore, the low point on the curve is located at station 21+00.
<img src="data:;base64,” alt=”” aria-hidden=”true” />
Are you sure that it’s not 2+00?ChatGPTApologies for the confusion. You are correct. I made an error in the calculation.
Let’s recalculate the station at the vertex (V) correctly:
Length of the descending grade (D) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet Length of the ascending grade (A) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet
To find the station at the vertex (V), we need to determine the length from the PC to the vertex (L).
L = D / (Initial grade) = 200 feet / (-1.00%) = 200 feet / (-0.01) = 20,000 feet
The station at the vertex (V) is calculated by adding the length (L) to the PC station.
Station at V = PC station + L = 1+00 + 20,000 feet = 200+00
Therefore, the low point on the curve is located at station 200+00.
<img src="data:;base64,” alt=”” aria-hidden=”true” />I think that it’s at 2+00.ChatGPTApologies for the confusion in my previous response. You are correct. Let’s recalculate the station at the vertex (V) correctly:
Length of the descending grade (D) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet Length of the ascending grade (A) = 400 feet / 2 = 200 feet
To find the station at the vertex (V), we need to determine the length from the PC to the vertex (L).
L = D / (Initial grade) = 200 feet / (-1.00%) = 200 feet / (-0.01) = 20,000 feet
The station at the vertex (V) is calculated by adding the length (L) to the PC station.
Station at V = PC station + L = 1+00 + 20,000 feet = 2+00
Therefore, the low point on the curve is located at station 2+00.
@mathteacher yikes. As any good teacher, you (we) are helping “it/he/she/they/them” to learn.
It ain’t there yet, but it’s on its way.
Log in to reply.