Gene Kooper, post: 435356, member: 9850 wrote: And it is so easy!
That was a rise? Merely stating the obvious is hardly a rise.
The whole red herring of mining claims making the PLSS somehow equivalent to states within which every acre is part of an original grant described by metes and bounds and all that entails was disposed of years ago when the actual percentage of acres of PLSSia covered by the same is considered. Beyond that there may well be absolutely no mining claims whatsover in many states of PLSSia, so it obviously wasn't working for them as a demonstration of complexity. The whole "but we have mining claims" assertion was generally inapplicable.
Gene Kooper, post: 435355, member: 9850 wrote: No, Kent. I do mineral survey retracements/resurveys for both mining and private clients. None are "mortgage surveys".
Let the record show, however, that you declined to answer the question whether you actually EVER resurvey played-out placer claims. If in fact you occasionally do, approximately what percentage of your time is spent on that as an activity. Would less than 10% be a fair estimate or is it so inconsequential that it is even less?
[MEDIA=youtube]W5vV_K4533A[/MEDIA]
Word to the wisexxx
😎
