Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Adjusted Bearings (DMS) and Horizontal Distances (FeetUS)
=========================================================
(Relative Confidence of Bearing is in Seconds)
From To Bearing Distance 95% RelConfidence
Brg Dist PPM
1 32 N00-07-15.76E 1146.8810 0.95 0.0141 12.2898
How does star*net calc the ppm shown above?
thanks for your help
Posted : September 10, 2017 10:31 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Is it a realistsic value, maybe the last ppm value you entered in your last SN project ??
Posted : September 10, 2017 1:10 pm
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
Dane Mince, post: 446182, member: 296 wrote: How does star*net calc the ppm shown above?
It appears to be dividing the 95% relative confidence value by the distance.
Posted : September 10, 2017 2:00 pm