Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Something new (to me) popped up that I'm curious if anyone else has seen before. A pair of streets intersect in a typical 90, street A and street B. Street A was vacated in the 50s. Street B was widened by 5 feet via fee acquisition on one side in the 90s. The instrument for the acquisition of the 5 foot strip excepts out the portion of the strip that passes through the vacated street A.
I'm wondering why it was done that way. Is there some rule that says the government can't reacquire property it once had or something?
Posted : 29/06/2023 6:34 am
