AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Regarding PPP processing replication

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
410 Views
Corse
(@corse)
Posts: 3
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have some GNSS L1 L2 data collected from a Trimble receiver of a single station. I would like to obtain the NEU errors over time. So for a single station, PPP may be the only option.

I analyzed the GNSS position data using CSRS , RTKPOST, gLAB. From the results, I noticed that the CSRS results for NEU errors is the least, while RTKPOST and gLAB were comparatively larger. Anyone knows what is the factors in affecting their accuracies?

I tried to replicate the results in RTKPOST and gLAB with no avail. Anyone has any suggestions?

Thanks
Corse


 
Posted : April 14, 2015 12:09 am
geeoddmike
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

FWIW,

Are you trying to compare within session NEU differences per epoch or between sessions?

As for PPP tools, have you tried this one from NASA?

http://apps.gdgps.net/apps_underhood.php

The page linked above describes the tool and the modeling performed. I believe the answer to your query is to be found in the differences in how each tool works. The choice of ephemeris used could also play a role.

I posted a solution file from the tool here:

http://geodesyattamucc.pbworks.com/w/file/64269766/APPS_solution.txt

HTH,

DMM


 
Posted : April 14, 2015 3:32 am