AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Pincushion Factory

24 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
493 Views
a-harris
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8759
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

[USER=323]@Paul D[/USER]

When someone inserts information contained in private records into documents that are recorded into public records, how can that information be fact checked?


 
Posted : March 5, 2017 10:03 pm
paul-d
(@paul-d)
Posts: 488
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The notes I refer to are in my case from the DOT, and in the case of the other surveyor, all are welcome to do their own research in the archives.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk


 
Posted : March 5, 2017 10:55 pm
ppm
 ppm
(@ppm)
Posts: 464
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A Harris, post: 417054, member: 81 wrote: [USER=323]@Paul D[/USER]

When someone inserts information contained in private records into documents that are recorded into public records, how can that information be fact checked?

How can any information on a historic document get fact checked? I suspect the same way non-recording (of surveys) states work. The deed's get recorded, based on an unrecorded survey, how can anyone fact check them. Take the evidence that can be ascertained and go.

I guess it shows how spoiled we can be in recording states.


 
Posted : March 6, 2017 1:38 pm
a-harris
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8759
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

[USER=6808]@ppm[/USER]

When I see that, I would expect the surveyor to record the referenced document for all to see.
Without verification, it seems to me they are just saying it is that way because I say that it is.


 
Posted : March 6, 2017 3:35 pm
Page 2 / 2