AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Perpetuation of the Point of Commencement myth.

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
342 Views
DeletedUser
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8340
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

is not for me.

I did a re sub and now I will prepare the new title description.
It is 3 tracts that are being formed into one.
It is about 7 acres of the most top dollar commercial real estate that one will find here.

Past surveys from the 80's.

Here is a situation that I run into frequently and see more and more of on local surveys.
The point of commencement myth.
Most of these surveys are shown to be always tied to a section corner or /1/4 cor that is long gone and forgotten.
The descriptions will continue to use these monuments and/or corners as the point of commencement.

On plats, surveyors will even show the point of commencement and tie measurements based on the old title document or previous survey without a tie.
Some will use verbiage such as "reported by "Mr. Old surveyor XXX" on his plat etc."

I tie unless it is not possible as in this case
This is located in a head rights section where the monument corners are long gone.
It would be futile to remonument the corner
In this case, it falls on a street in an exclusive PUD that has been around for 40 years.
So I really have nada when it comes to a point of commencement to base a M&B description other than one of the property corners of the tract.
There is an safe and secure NGS PBM located nearby that I have tied but commencing from that monument will raise a lot of 'foreign flags' with the attorneys etc.

just a rant and off to lunch....gumbo is on


 
Posted : July 22, 2010 11:23 am
Frank Shelton
(@frank-shelton)
Posts: 273
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

i don't use a POC unless i actually tied it, but i will say how my POB lies from a patent/survey corner "by descriptions". this my way of giving an abstractor a way to connect to the patent/survey instead of what i see as the usual "beginning at my left foot ... thence...."


 
Posted : July 22, 2010 1:19 pm
DeletedUser
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8340
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks Frank. That is a very good point.

duh on me. I guess that it would help the clerk of court, assessor and the eventual GIS department.

R.


 
Posted : July 22, 2010 2:10 pm
Richard Schaut
(@richard-schaut)
Posts: 273
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Maintaining the 'chain of title' by clearly explaining any necessary correction(s) to our land records is a critical part of the surveyor's professional work product.

That is why there is no set of 'fill in the blanks' forms for surveyors.

Richard Schaut

Attached files


 
Posted : July 23, 2010 10:45 am