AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

OPUS troubleshooting

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
962 Views
sdancey
(@sdancey)
Posts: 4
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hey everyone, new to the site and looking for a little help. Recently we have been having trouble w/ .dat sets sent to OPUS for processing. We have been getting back some funky messages as to why OPUS can't process. This is the latest we have received back.

FILE: 57940521.12o OP1330603744646

6029 After the single baseline analysis, fewer than 3 useable
6029 reference stations remain. Aborting.
6029

Has anyone seen messages like this sent back on simple rapid-static sessions to aquire SPC's. Any help would be greatly appriciated.


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 6:39 am
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

''Resubmit Next Day'' Is What It Says

It pretty much means that for whatever reason, they do not have good CORS data. It may be useless, it may need to be cleaned up ot they did not get it yet.

Paul in PA


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 6:46 am
sdancey
(@sdancey)
Posts: 4
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

I ran this file on the 21st Feb, and didn't try to process until 29th, and agian today. Should I continue to try til it processes.


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 6:54 am
Ralph Perez
(@ralph-perez)
Posts: 1262
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

Have you looked at some of the quality indicators? Or is that all it says?

Ralph


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 8:02 am
sdancey
(@sdancey)
Posts: 4
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

I can't tell any RMS or observations used, they won't even run the file to get a data sheet back, it just keeps aborting. We where in a large field with good sat. coverage at the time of the file run.


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 9:11 am

DavidALee
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1116
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

Have you looked at your file in a text editor to check for signs of problems? That would be a place to start.


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 9:58 am
half-bubble
(@half-bubble)
Posts: 939
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

Agreed, in particular, look at the autonomous position in the header. If the receiver started logging data before you had a good fix, it might think you are way out in the ocean somewhere with no CORS nearby.


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 10:02 am
Eric Bowles
(@eric-bowles)
Posts: 73
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

That's interesting: On 2/23 I did a 45 minute RS session in absolutely wide open conditions, in an area that should be covered, and I got the following message after submitting to OPUS-RS.

6009 The OPUS-RS solution for the position of the rover has
6009 failed to converge after 5 iterations. This could be due to
6009 especially noisy data (among other reasons). If you really need
6009 a position for this station, you might try another data set.

Wasn't this around the time of the solar flares?


 
Posted : March 1, 2012 2:49 pm
sdancey
(@sdancey)
Posts: 4
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

resubmit

I got a similar message a while back and I finally got our file to run by converting my file to rinex myself, as opposed to letting OPUS do it for me. You may try that on your file and see if it will run for you. I have got several strange messages back on our files lately and am puzzled by them, it has become, "keep your fingers crossed" kind of thing when processing through OPUS.


 
Posted : March 5, 2012 6:41 am