Helping out a friend in New York with post-processing some Mobile Mapping data out of a Promark 3 in Mobile Mapper Office. The raw data in the Mobile Mapper Job file is fine and the time on points is correct.
However, when I bring in Rinex 2.11 data from NYSNET (1-second epoch), the time on point for each point gets all messed up and trimmed back.
Anyone have similar issues? Is it the Rinex version?
Thanks,
Matt
No, I never had that problem. Try setting the epoch to 10 seconds via UFCORS when selectung data set. Doubt you would need 1 second epochs.
Are you using Topcon Tools to retrieve your cors data?
Lee Green
BTW. Did you ever sell the Hiper Lite
Should not be a problem, but if you suspect Rinex version, open up a Rinex file in a text editor and simply change the 2.11 to 2.10 at the top of the file, save and see if it takes it. Worth a try.
> No, I never had that problem. Try setting the epoch to 10 seconds via UFCORS when selectung data set. Doubt you would need 1 second epochs.
>
> Are you using Topcon Tools to retrieve your cors data?
>
> Lee Green
>
> BTW. Did you ever sell the Hiper Lite
Lee,
Tried UFCORS too and same deal. Thanks for the idea though. Yes, sold one of the Hipers and running the other VRS.
Matt
> Should not be a problem, but if you suspect Rinex version, open up a Rinex file in a text editor and simply change the 2.11 to 2.10 at the top of the file, save and see if it takes it. Worth a try.
Gave this a go too with no resolution. Thanks, Matt
Have you brought in the same data via NGS ufcors?
Check if the RINEX format is different.
Paul in PA
Paul,
Yes, brought in data from the same CORS via UFCORS, same result. UFCORS was 2.10, NYSNET 2.11...
Thanks,
Matt
As an aside I registered with NYSNET just to compare data. Still waiting. So I grabbed an hour of data from NYHB from ufcors and was surprised to see I could not get 1 second data.
BTW. there are way too many comments in the NGS file header. As I recall a RINEX file header only requires 4 or 5 lines of data. Years ago I kept removing header data until OPUS would not accept it. That info is somewhere in the archives on the other board.
I would try removing the file splice comments from the data.
Paul in PA