AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

No Wonder

8 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
385 Views
snoop
(@snoop)
Posts: 1461
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

And now we now why the GIS/Tax Assessor folks can't seem to get it right.


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 8:41 am
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

They must be using international feet;-)


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 8:49 am
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10534
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Kidding aside; that may be correct if the program is converting from grid to surface (of course, why not convert the SqFt first).


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 8:53 am
stephen-ward
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2244
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

LOL - That's one county over from me. I gave the Assessor a call to let him know that they goofed. He said they had grabbed that tool elsewhere and failed to QC it before making it available.


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 9:00 am
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

What a bunch of maroons!

Everybody knows the correct conversion figure is 1320.


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 9:06 am

DeralOfLawton
(@deral-of-lawton)
Posts: 1711
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Makes you wonder if their "Tax Tool" also might need to be checked.


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 9:16 am
james-fleming
(@james-fleming)
Posts: 5732
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Deral

> Makes you wonder if their "Tax Tool" also might need to be checked.

The government's "Tax Tool" is always checked, calibrated and ready to be deployed whenever a citizen bends over 🙁


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 9:21 am
stephen-ward
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2244
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

What a bunch of maroons!

I couldn't stand not knowing how they got this so wrong, so I grabbed the source code for their page. Here's the section that does the calculations:

function areaCon() {
var a1 = document.conv2.area1.selectedIndex;
var a2 = document.conv2.area2.selectedIndex;
var a = document.conv2.areaval1.value;
document.conv2.areaval2.value;

if (a1 == 1 && a2 == 1) {document.conv2.areaval2.value = a;}
if (a1 == 1 && a2 == 2) {document.conv2.areaval2.value = Math.round((((a) * 0.000023)) * 100000) / 100000;}

if (a1 == 2 && a2 == 1) {document.conv2.areaval2.value = Math.round((((a) * 43559.458316)) * 100000) / 100000;}
if (a1 == 2 && a2 == 2) {document.conv2.areaval2.value = a;}

I was taught that the conversion from Sq. Ft. to Acres is Sq. Ft./43560=Acres. Apparently their programmer thought 1/43560 rounded to six decimal places (0.000023) was a sufficient substitute.

Their conversion factor for acres to sq. ft is 1 acre=43559.458316 sq. ft. I'm not sure how they arrived at this factor, but I bet it involved more careless math and probably a few assumptions.:-P


 
Posted : June 23, 2011 11:00 am