AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

GLONASS Launch Today

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
396 Views
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Russia put 3 more modern type M satellites in orbit today. That is the second launch of 3 this year, there are now 21 in orbit with 2 spares. Three more type Ms are scheduled for launch in November, which would give GLONASS a full galaxy of 24 satellites. On top of that there is a planned launch of a next generation type K satellite scheduled for December.

Paul in PA


 
Posted : September 2, 2010 5:51 pm
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

GLONASS Life ?

The M satellites that have been put up are designed to last 7 years. From what I see there have been fewer short time failures in the last few years.

The K satellite to be launched in December is designed to last 10 years. I surmise since it is to be launched as a single it will be heavier than the Ms or it just may be because it is a test vehicle. As they did with the Ms they will most likely intersperse the 2011 launches till they run out of M inventory, i.e. launch 2 Ms and 1 K or 1 M and 1 K. They would soon have 1 K in each of the 3 orbits. With the galaxy full there will be less push to put 3 in an orbit at a time. As I read it they have at times lauched 3 in 1 orbit and turned 1 into a brand new spare till needed. I doubt they would use a different launch vehicle, since they have a lock on reasonable reliability.

Paul in PA


 
Posted : September 3, 2010 7:27 pm