AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Confrontational Email

25 Posts
19 Users
0 Reactions
818 Views
Guest
(@guest)
Posts: 1651
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree completely about the need to send a certified letter.

I would just approach this as a boundary survey and refer the servient owner to "62-18-124 Right-of-entry Liability Notice to landowners Injunctions" in the TN statutes, with a comment that the responses to his valid concerns will be found there, and that the letter constitutes notice per the statute. Most of his stated concerns are invalid, however. He cannot modify the provisions of the law by making it more restrictive on the surveyor. Agreeing to unwarranted restrictions might make the surveyor liable for delay to the client. He would probably not be surveying the easement unless some project clock were ticking.

In different circumstances I might be more open to cooperating with a more cooperative owner. But we still don't know the purpose of the easement or the reason for a current survey.


 
Posted : December 13, 2011 2:52 pm
a-harris
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8759
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

You did what I would have done, forward it on to the client and let them deal with the landowners about access.

You are working for them and they got lawyers that should handle those details for their clients interest.

Legally you should be able to enter, it would be nice if your contact person with the Feds would give the landowner a call and let them have the apparent heated discussion the landowner wants to have with someone.

He may be looking to sue someone after he has run over your stakes and it gets shoved into the radiator....


 
Posted : December 13, 2011 3:24 pm
DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP
(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)
Posts: 2054
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Breathing through bullet holes is a risky enterprise.

In Ontario we have the right of entry, subject to damages.

Cheers

Derek


 
Posted : December 13, 2011 5:12 pm
Dan Collins
(@dan-collins)
Posts: 158
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree with Derek, no job/project is worth getting shot.

I would explain to the client what has happened and what the land owner is requesting and explain to the land owner why you need to be on the property.

Most of the paperwork looks routine. It is added work on your part and I would inform the client how much effort is required and how much you expect them to pay for it.

And be prepared to take the law with you when you go.

Reminds me of an old joke about when a land owner confronted the survey crew...he points the shotgun at the crew chief and asks "who is in charge of this outfit?"....
the crew chief calmly responds "you are"

Safety first. Always. Every time. No exceptions


 
Posted : December 14, 2011 4:25 am
SURVEYLTD
(@surveyltd)
Posts: 158
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

PAULPLATANO

Are you speaking of a "Customer Contact" law in your location or Illinois ?

I have never heard of this requirement in Illinois.


 
Posted : December 14, 2011 9:43 am

Page 2 / 2