@michigan-left "Surveyors are not fact finders." I vehemently disagree. A surveyor collects facts, applies their knowledge to determine which of those facts are evidence, and then evaluates that evidence with respect to their understanding of how the legal system works with regards to boundaries.?ÿ
?ÿ
Fair enough. But the "fact" is, you are wrong.
Now, PROVE which one of us is correct...
Just to recap: you asserted an opinion ("I vehemently disagree".), and I asserted a "fact".
So, per your rationale: I just used a fact, then applied some knowledge to determine that my fact is evidence of what?
This is why everyone is NOT entitled to their own "facts".
Evidence is used to evaluate what facts are. Surveyors collect evidence.
?ÿ
@michigan-left?ÿ now you are just trolling. If your evidence are not facts, you are doing something wrong.
If I was trolling, I would use an ad hominem attack.
I offered a logic exercise that points out the fallacy of a premise.
Like Mark Twain supposedly said (and I've posted before): "What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so."
