AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Is it just me or do I feel law enforcement and news agencies think they can break all the UAS rules

28 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
1,286 Views
a-harris
(@a-harris)
Posts: 8759
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Apprehend who?
The police are spying on people.
Some are intercepting cell phone texts and conversations.
Are the general public able to investigate any law enforcement person or agency.
That would be a NO.
They are people too and must obey the same laws we do.


 
Posted : August 3, 2017 6:06 pm
spledeus
(@spledeus)
Posts: 2757
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 439957, member: 379 wrote: I disagree. Law Enforcement should be able to use whatever method available to apprehend suspects including drones. Sans rules for the private sector. 🙂

Wow. They are not above the law, they enforce the law. Most of them do not know the laws they are enforcing.

Had a client who cut the neighbors' hedge and was charged with criminal trespass. Dad represented the sightline easement in the bylaw and charges were dropped.

Did you see the one with the former CIA employees arrested because they had purchased hydroponic equipment to grow veggies for a science experiment with their children?

I will modify my statement based on that: if the police are 100% competent and 100% fair, then they can do what they want.


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 6:15 am
spledeus
(@spledeus)
Posts: 2757
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

makerofmaps, post: 439830, member: 9079 wrote: I saw this article today https://unmanned-aerial.com/la-sheriffs-office-completes-successful-nighttime-uas-task In it the Bossier Sheriffƒ??s Office is bragging how the caught a suspect at night with the thermal imaging. So I go to https://www.faa.gov/uas/request_waiver/waivers_granted/ and https://www.faa.gov/uas/beyond_the_basics/section_333/333_authorizations/ and https://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/foia_responses/ and start searching for an exemption that gave them authorization to fly at night and 2 were they flying beyond line of sight? This is not directed at them but I keep seeing many law enforcement (ie my own sherrif department posting on fb a drone video promo of a festival where people were even waiving at the drone) that don't have anything more than a remote pilots license. In fact in some states it forbids law enforcement from video without a search warrant. This would mean no flying to monitor crowds. Then I also see the news media flying over people, moving vehicles and wonder where their exemtion to commercial UAS rules are? Anybody else seeing this?

What happens when one falls from the sky and climbers Someone?


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 6:16 am
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Autocorrect? Right?


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 6:30 am
FL/GA PLS
(@flga-pls)
Posts: 7403
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Write. 🙂


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 6:34 am

holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Their must bee sum grate autocorrect stories out they're.


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 6:38 am
FL/GA PLS
(@flga-pls)
Posts: 7403
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

A Harris, post: 440002, member: 81 wrote: The police are spying on people.

Only the one's suspected of criminal activity. In Law Enforcement it's called surveillance and it is legal. 😎


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 9:10 am
brad-ott
(@brad-ott)
Posts: 6178
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 440338, member: 379 wrote: Only the one's suspected of criminal activity.

(Snarky font on)
Oh, thank God.
(Snarky font off)


 
Posted : August 6, 2017 10:37 am
Page 2 / 2