Andy J, post: 430896, member: 44 wrote: Ok... he said "excellent results".
I think 0.13' *is* excellent results for photogrammetry. It's not good enough for most of what I do, but for some work it's fine.
gschrock, post: 430903, member: 556 wrote: Have you looked into VDI's (virtual desktop infrastructure).
Wouldn't that require a very fast Internet connection to be practical? Getting thousands of high-res images to those servers in a finite period of time would be a challenge for many folks.
gschrock, post: 430917, member: 556 wrote: True that. High bandwidth for upload/download, and if that is not practical to queue up in off hours that would kill that option. Bandwidth for operating the processing remotely is minimal, but you are right, the upload would be a bear.
I am currently uploading 200 images or more, and it churns for a bit in the background, but no real issue.
Let me know how the Daas and offsite processing works out!