So I did some checking yesterday with our NYSNet setup and I'm coming up with a 3.21' difference from our control (-3.17' in Northing, 0.53' in Easting, and -1.69' in Height). Control was confirmed by both OPUS solution, and Post Processing with results being within 0.01' in both Northing and Easting.
Any ideas on why I'm getting this much of an error? It must be some setting that I have incorrect in the job configuration I'm guessing.
Yes, I have an idea.
I wish you would contact me for some formal training. You are wasting a lot of time and money learning this by trial and error.
!
!
!
!
!
!
You most likely?ÿselected Datum NAD2011 in Magnet Field. As mentioned earlier in this thread you MUST use Datum NAD83_NO_TRANS. This often equates to 3.78ft difference. NYSNET?ÿhas already corrected for NAD2011, you are applying the correction?ÿagain.
You can make the Datum change in Magnet Field job, and the software we recompute all the raw data.
If that does not work, then check your units. US Survey?ÿfeet vs International Feet.
?ÿ
I am using NAD83_NO_TRANS and still have the difference between the two and I am using US Survey feet for units.
Do I still want the Projection in SPC83-New York (Central), or should that be set to none?
?ÿ
Then you have something else incorrect.
Just yesterday I compared a 3 hour OPUS with a NYSNET?ÿRTN, and it matched within 0.04'.
?ÿ
Lee, I started to reply but sending out 3 HiPer V systems and GT-500 robots plus Uncle Bill Gates deciding my computer MUST reboot to complete installing updates killed my post.
I would not ascribe motive to the incorrect statements in the initial ad slicks for the HiPer V.?ÿ But I too saw that same thing in print.?ÿ Everything about the HiPer V should be capable of supporting L5 and Galileo at least because the chip in the HiPer V is the same as what is in the GR-5.?ÿ But it does not support anything other than GPS and GLONASS and I believe that is simply because the actual GPS antenna inside the receiver does not have the required elements to receive those signals.?ÿ And to be fair, when the HiPer V was released there was effectively nothing to track but the two constellations the V supports.
I did another test yesterday and everything is working correctly now. I'm getting a difference of less than .03' horizontal and .05' vertical.
Only thing I can think of is that I didn't give it enough time to solve. I noticed yesterday that it said it was fixed, but it took upwards of a minute until it was agreeing with the control. Thanks again for the help.
