The seriousness of ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The seriousness of the Missouri River.

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

Realizing that many don't live near the Missouri River and it might seem insignificant, the current situation and impending situation could have devastating affects upon this entire country.

In an opinion column last week a former USGS official, Bernard Shanks, offered a frightening scenario of dam failure. He theorized that a domino effect of catastrophic failures of dams more than a half-century old, could trigger a flood of biblical proportions that would consume bridges and cities while splitting the nation in two.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/article_2b1eeca2-e701-51dd-83c2-f7bcc81845a4.html

At Gavins Point Dam near Yankton, South Dakota, 150,000 cubic feet per second is currently being released. Normal release time of year is around 30,000 cubic feet per second. The same situation is happening at the other dams above Gavins Point.

This situation will remain until at least September. That doesn't take into account any additional rain.

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 7:21 am
 RFB
(@rfb)
Posts: 1504
Registered
 

Countless sewage treatment plants, toxic waste sites and even Superfund sites would be flushed downstream.

This is horrible. Let's hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 7:37 am
(@glenn-borkenhagen)
Posts: 410
Customer
 

Thanks for posting that, Jerry.

The Shanks article fails to mention (or make it clear) that the Fort Peck Dam actually failed during construction in September 1938, an event that killed eight men.

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 7:45 am
(@keith)
Posts: 2051
Registered
 

The Yellowstone River that flows past my home town of Sidney, Montana is probably higher then it has been in years or maybe setting a record....and that water is coming downstream into Missouri and that high water was even before the traditional June raise.

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 7:57 am
(@joe-nathan)
Posts: 399
Registered
 

Which would eventually pass by my house

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 8:33 am
(@guest)
Posts: 1658
Registered
 

1500 miles wide?! Is that even possible? JRL

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 9:52 am
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

Obviously that distance has to be an error. Maybe they meant to say 1,500 meters. The historic Missouri River plain through the Dakotas and along the Nebraska/Iowa/Missouri borders are confined by high bluffs. At one point below Sioux City the plain is about 17 miles wide, but most is in the area of 5 miles or less.

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 10:14 am
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

"...leaving a gap 1,500 miles wide"

I think that was meant to say "...leaving a gap 1,500 miles long".

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 11:56 am
(@guest)
Posts: 1658
Registered
 

That makes more sense. Dang reporters can't get anything right.

JRL

 
Posted : June 16, 2011 1:28 pm