OK, probably shouldn't post this in humor, but pardon me if I find the irony funny.
Some guy rants and raves about waiting and waiting for a response from BLM about his perception of the confusion held by a misguided profession. Finally receives it a day or so after he gets banned from the public forum he so desires to rip the response apart in.
He is bloviating about it elsewhere, should inquiring minds need to know. I'd offer him some constructive criticism, but am doubtful he would be very accepting.
I saw that he was over there ranting, and read the nice blm response.
What did the BLM have to say?
inquiring minds wait with baited breath...
NO. It was the cat who ate the cheese that waited with "baited" breath.
[sarcasm]"Hey dude, write a book or drink the kool-aid"[/sarcasm]
😉
> What did the BLM have to say?
>
> inquiring minds wait with baited breath...
Basically thank you for your past service as a valued employee and BLM policy is contained in the manual.
The Bogeyman is firing off that the response is a non answer and is not coming from top chief.
Strangely, coincident, the BLM letter is dated 4/19, the day certain posting rights were revoked.
what is of value is the original requests have been posted "over there" which are of some interest. I"ll leave it at that.
silenced theory? maybe never
Well considered response. If that man had spent that many years at the BLM, any argument, tempest or not, is likely valid or with some amount of merit. I still don't understand why he was banned for arguing....surveying????:-S
well, I think they will accept him with open arms over there, probably the most posts they have had in a very long time.
