DYE v. ANDERSON TULLY COMPANY

Business, Finance & Legal

Last Post by Jerry Knight 13 years ago

3 Posts

3 Users

0 Reactions

4 Views

RSS

DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP

(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)

Posts: 2060

Registered

Topic starter

...............accretion of the land along the Arkansas River

http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20ARCO%2020110907009.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR

A few principles on water boundaries etc.

Cheers

Derek

Posted : September 8, 2011 12:21 pm

ddsm

(@ddsm)

Posts: 2229

Derek,
I've been following this one from the beginning. It is similar to Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. You can't claim what doesn't exist.

Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.

DDSM
:beer:

Posted : September 8, 2011 1:53 pm

Jerry Knight

(@jerry-knight)

Posts: 123

Registered

Dan and Derek,
Both cases are worth reading and saving. Anderson Tully has been involved in many riparian cases. I like the Banks v Chicago Mill case you referenced for the discussion of the processes of accretion and avulsion. Brings back memories of the Laughlin classes and discussions with Jim Simpson.

Best to you both.

Jerry

Posted : September 8, 2011 6:38 pm